1,17-dichloro-6,12-dioxa-3,9,15-trithia-heptadecane | 114811-45-9

• 分子结构分类: 有机化合物 - 有机氧化合物
• 英文名称: 1,17-dichloro-6,12-dioxa-3,9,15-trithia-heptadecane
• 英文别名: 1,17-Dichlor-6,12-dioxa-3,9,15-trithia-heptadecan；1-[2-(2-Chloroethylsulfanyl)ethoxy]-2-[2-[2-(2-chloroethylsulfanyl)ethoxy]ethylsulfanyl]ethane
• CAS: 114811-45-9
• 化学式: C₁₂H₂₄Cl₂O₂S₃
• 分子量: 367.425
• InChiKey: SHJCYVRQMXSKKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N

物化性质

• 熔点：
  18 °C
• 沸点：
  493.0±45.0 °C(Predicted)
• 密度：
  1.208±0.06 g/cm3(Predicted)

计算性质

• 辛醇/水分配系数(LogP)：
  3.1
• 重原子数：
  19
• 可旋转键数：
  16
• 环数：
  0.0
• sp3杂化的碳原子比例：
  1.0
• 拓扑面积：
  94.4
• 氢给体数：
  0
• 氢受体数：
  5

反应信息

• 作为反应物：
  描述：

  1,17-dichloro-6,12-dioxa-3,9,15-trithia-heptadecane 、 sodium thiomethoxide 在 sodium ethanolate 作用下， 生成 1,17-bis-methylsulfanyl-6,12-dioxa-3,9,15-trithia-heptadecane
  参考文献：
  名称：

  Policy analysis in the presence of distorting taxes

  摘要：

  This article first describes the new literature in environmental economics on the so-called "double-dividend" and then explores its implications for a broad range of economic issues. This literature reveals that in a second-best, general-equilibrium setting environmental measures raise costs and prices and thereby reduce the real wage. This rise in the cost of living reduces slightly the quantity of labor supplied in an already highly distorted labor market, giving rise to losses in social welfare that can be large relative to the basic gains from a cleaner environment. These losses can be offset to some extent by using revenues (if any) from the environmental programs to reduce existing taxes on labor This same line of analysis applies to many programs and institutions in the economy that mise the cost of living: tariffs and quotas on imports, agricultural price-support programs, monopoly pricing, programs of occupational licensure that limit entry, and many others. Thus, traditional, partial-equilibrium benefit-cost analysis appears, in many instances, to have unwittingly omitted from the calculations a potentially quite significant class of social costs. (C) 2000 by the Association for Public Policy and Management.

  DOI：

  10.1002/1520-6688(200023)19:4<603::aid-pam5>3.0.co;2-3
• 作为产物：
  描述：

  6,12-dioxa-3,9,15-trithia-heptadecane-1,17-diol 在 氯化亚砜 、 氯仿 作用下， 生成 1,17-dichloro-6,12-dioxa-3,9,15-trithia-heptadecane
  参考文献：
  名称：

  Policy analysis in the presence of distorting taxes

  摘要：

  This article first describes the new literature in environmental economics on the so-called "double-dividend" and then explores its implications for a broad range of economic issues. This literature reveals that in a second-best, general-equilibrium setting environmental measures raise costs and prices and thereby reduce the real wage. This rise in the cost of living reduces slightly the quantity of labor supplied in an already highly distorted labor market, giving rise to losses in social welfare that can be large relative to the basic gains from a cleaner environment. These losses can be offset to some extent by using revenues (if any) from the environmental programs to reduce existing taxes on labor This same line of analysis applies to many programs and institutions in the economy that mise the cost of living: tariffs and quotas on imports, agricultural price-support programs, monopoly pricing, programs of occupational licensure that limit entry, and many others. Thus, traditional, partial-equilibrium benefit-cost analysis appears, in many instances, to have unwittingly omitted from the calculations a potentially quite significant class of social costs. (C) 2000 by the Association for Public Policy and Management.

  DOI：

  10.1002/1520-6688(200023)19:4<603::aid-pam5>3.0.co;2-3

文献信息

• Policy analysis in the presence of distorting taxes
  作者：Ian W.H. Parry、Wallace E. Oates

  DOI：10.1002/1520-6688(200023)19:4<603::aid-pam5>3.0.co;2-3

  日期：——

  This article first describes the new literature in environmental economics on the so-called "double-dividend" and then explores its implications for a broad range of economic issues. This literature reveals that in a second-best, general-equilibrium setting environmental measures raise costs and prices and thereby reduce the real wage. This rise in the cost of living reduces slightly the quantity of labor supplied in an already highly distorted labor market, giving rise to losses in social welfare that can be large relative to the basic gains from a cleaner environment. These losses can be offset to some extent by using revenues (if any) from the environmental programs to reduce existing taxes on labor This same line of analysis applies to many programs and institutions in the economy that mise the cost of living: tariffs and quotas on imports, agricultural price-support programs, monopoly pricing, programs of occupational licensure that limit entry, and many others. Thus, traditional, partial-equilibrium benefit-cost analysis appears, in many instances, to have unwittingly omitted from the calculations a potentially quite significant class of social costs. (C) 2000 by the Association for Public Policy and Management.