摩熵化学
数据库官网
小程序
打开微信扫一扫
首页 分子通 化学资讯 化学百科 反应查询 关于我们
请输入关键词

(3S,8S,9S,10R,13R,14S,17R)-3-氯-17-[(2R,5R)-5-乙基-6-甲基庚烷-2-基]-10,13-二甲基-2,3,4,7,8,9,11,12,14,15,16,17-十二氢-1H-环戊二烯并[a]菲 | 33999-15-4

中文名称
(3S,8S,9S,10R,13R,14S,17R)-3-氯-17-[(2R,5R)-5-乙基-6-甲基庚烷-2-基]-10,13-二甲基-2,3,4,7,8,9,11,12,14,15,16,17-十二氢-1H-环戊二烯并[a]菲
中文别名
——
英文名称
(24R)-3β-chlorostigmast-5-ene
英文别名
Sitosteryl β-chloride;3β-chloro-stigmast-5-ene;3β-Chlor-stigmast-5-en;3β-Chlor-stigmasten-(5);3-Chlorostigmast-5-ene;(3S,8S,9S,10R,13R,14S,17R)-3-chloro-17-[(2R,5R)-5-ethyl-6-methylheptan-2-yl]-10,13-dimethyl-2,3,4,7,8,9,11,12,14,15,16,17-dodecahydro-1H-cyclopenta[a]phenanthrene
(3S,8S,9S,10R,13R,14S,17R)-3-氯-17-[(2R,5R)-5-乙基-6-甲基庚烷-2-基]-10,13-二甲基-2,3,4,7,8,9,11,12,14,15,16,17-十二氢-1H-环戊二烯并[a]菲化学式
CAS
33999-15-4
化学式
C29H49Cl
mdl
——
分子量
433.161
InChiKey
IMWQDSKRNHVSQV-VJSFXXLFSA-N
BEILSTEIN
——
EINECS
——
  • 物化性质
  • 计算性质
  • ADMET
  • 安全信息
  • SDS
  • 制备方法与用途
  • 上下游信息
  • 反应信息
  • 文献信息
  • 表征谱图
  • 同类化合物
  • 相关功能分类
  • 相关结构分类

计算性质

  • 辛醇/水分配系数(LogP):
    10.6
  • 重原子数:
    30
  • 可旋转键数:
    6
  • 环数:
    4.0
  • sp3杂化的碳原子比例:
    0.93
  • 拓扑面积:
    0
  • 氢给体数:
    0
  • 氢受体数:
    0

SDS

SDS:f69e421e657405771fad6479b6b86760
查看

上下游信息

  • 上游原料
    中文名称 英文名称 CAS号 化学式 分子量
  • 下游产品
    中文名称 英文名称 CAS号 化学式 分子量

反应信息

点击查看最新优质反应信息

文献信息

  • Sterols. LXXXVII. Cholesterol and Sitosterol Derivatives
    作者:Russell E. Marker、Ewald Rohrmann
    DOI:10.1021/ja01860a016
    日期:1940.3
  • 206. Steroids and the Walden inversion. Part IV. Derivatives of 6-ketositostane and 6 : 17-diketoandrostane
    作者:C. W. Shoppee
    DOI:10.1039/jr9480001043
    日期:——
  • Sterols. XXVII. epi-Sitosterol and epi-Stigmasterol
    作者:Russell E. Marker、Elmer J. Lawson、Eugene L. Wittle、Thomas S. Oakwood
    DOI:10.1021/ja01291a071
    日期:1937.12
  • Sterols. XXVI. Sitosteryl Chloride, Stigmasteryl Chloride and Related Compounds
    作者:Russell E. Marker、Elmer J. Lawson
    DOI:10.1021/ja01291a070
    日期:1937.12
  • Pragmatic guidelines for determining road investment priorities in developing countries
    作者:Brian Field、Duncan Hamilton
    DOI:10.1080/13504500209470118
    日期:2002.9
    In many developing countries, the determination of a ranking of investments designed to improve and extend the road system is a commonplace prerequisite of planning for the transport sector as a whole and the road sub-sector within it. A major objective of determining investment priorities is to secure the greatest efficiency in the use of resources allocated to the sector and, for this reason, any system of assigning priorities must rely upon conventional investment appraisal techniques producing quantifiable measures of worth. Exercises of this kind, in which road investments are identified and ranked, are usually undertaken to produce a road sector investment plan. The implementation of such plans is, however, often compromised because of perceived deficiencies with a methodology which places undue reliance on investment appraisal and fails to properly address the issue of public interest and sustainability. This paper attempts to produce a pragmatic set of ground rules which, while mindful of the need to promote economic efficiency, allow for other factors to be embraced in a more holistic methodology.
查看更多