4-羟基-环己烷-1,3-二羧酸 | 101567-41-3

• 分子结构分类: 有机化合物 - 有机氧化合物
• 中文名称: 4-羟基-环己烷-1,3-二羧酸
• 英文名称: 4-hydroxy-cyclohexane-1,3-dicarboxylic acid
• 英文别名: 4-Hydroxy-cyclohexan-1,3-dicarbonsaeure；4-Hydroxycyclohexane-1,3-dicarboxylic acid
• CAS: 101567-41-3
• 化学式: C₈H₁₂O₅
• 分子量: 188.18
• InChiKey: MMOHMYIBRWECMZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N

计算性质

• 辛醇/水分配系数(LogP)：
  0.1
• 重原子数：
  13
• 可旋转键数：
  2
• 环数：
  1.0
• sp3杂化的碳原子比例：
  0.75
• 拓扑面积：
  94.8
• 氢给体数：
  3
• 氢受体数：
  5

反应信息

• 作为产物：
  描述：

  4-羟基间苯二甲酸 在 sodium hydroxide 、 镍 作用下， 150.0 ℃ 、14.71 MPa 条件下， 生成 4-羟基-环己烷-1,3-二羧酸
  参考文献：
  名称：

  Die sozialen Konsequenzen der Restitution von Grundeigentum in Deutschland und Polen

  摘要：

  The article compares the policy, process and consequences of property restitution in the two contrasting post-Communist countries Poland and Germany: In Poland, there are still ongoing debates about what the legal regulations on property restitution should look like; in Germany, on the other hand, most of the restitution claims have now been settled. The stated goals of property restitution policy in both countries have been twofold: One aim has been the creation of justice by returning property to the legal owners, i.e. the moral dimension. Another one has been the dimension of privatization - or the functional aspect - of restitution. Here, property restitution should provide an effective mean for privatization policy by distributing formerly state-owned assets to private hands. Our analysis of the social and economic consequences of restitution in Poland and Germany shows, that the implementation of restitution policy has lead to a creation of new social inequalities and to a production of new injustices by overcoming old ones. By looking at two neighborhoods in the metropolitan region of Berlin (Prenzlauer Berg and Kleinmachnow), we show that the acceptance of restitution by the affected residents differs to a great extent.

  DOI：

  10.1007/bf03204036

文献信息

• Die sozialen Konsequenzen der Restitution von Grundeigentum in Deutschland und Polen
  作者：Birgit Glock、Hartmut Häußermann、Carsten Keller

  DOI：10.1007/bf03204036

  日期：2001.12

  The article compares the policy, process and consequences of property restitution in the two contrasting post-Communist countries Poland and Germany: In Poland, there are still ongoing debates about what the legal regulations on property restitution should look like; in Germany, on the other hand, most of the restitution claims have now been settled. The stated goals of property restitution policy in both countries have been twofold: One aim has been the creation of justice by returning property to the legal owners, i.e. the moral dimension. Another one has been the dimension of privatization - or the functional aspect - of restitution. Here, property restitution should provide an effective mean for privatization policy by distributing formerly state-owned assets to private hands. Our analysis of the social and economic consequences of restitution in Poland and Germany shows, that the implementation of restitution policy has lead to a creation of new social inequalities and to a production of new injustices by overcoming old ones. By looking at two neighborhoods in the metropolitan region of Berlin (Prenzlauer Berg and Kleinmachnow), we show that the acceptance of restitution by the affected residents differs to a great extent.