dineopentoxy disulfide

• 分子结构分类: 有机化合物 - 有机氧化合物
• 英文名称: dineopentoxy disulfide
• 英文别名: 1-(2,2-Dimethylpropoxydisulfanyl)oxy-2,2-dimethylpropane
• 化学式: C₁₀H₂₂O₂S₂
• 分子量: 238.415
• InChiKey: BYAKXHSHKICZJA-UHFFFAOYSA-N

计算性质

• 辛醇/水分配系数(LogP)：
  4.5
• 重原子数：
  14
• 可旋转键数：
  7
• 环数：
  0.0
• sp3杂化的碳原子比例：
  1.0
• 拓扑面积：
  69.1
• 氢给体数：
  0
• 氢受体数：
  4

反应信息

• 作为反应物：
  描述：

  亚硝基叔丁烷 、 dineopentoxy disulfide 以 苯 为溶剂， 生成 、
  参考文献：
  名称：

  Photolysis of Dialkoxy Disulfides:  A Convenient Source of Alkoxy Radicals for Addition to the Sphere of Fullerene C₆₀

  摘要：

  Photolysis of dialkoxy disulfides ROSSOR (R = Me, Et, i-Pr, t-Bu, i-PrCH2, t-BuCH(2)) yields the radicals RO(.), ROS(.), and ROS(.)=O that were identified on the basis of product analysis and spin trapping techniques. It has been shown that only the alkoxy radicals RO(.), produced from ROSSOR, add to the sphere of fullerene C-60 in steady state conditions to yield the RO-C-60(.) adducts which can be detected by ESR spectroscopy. The different trend of the hydrogen splitting constants in the RO-C-60(.) with respect to the corresponding RS-C-60(.) adducts previously reported has been interpreted as a consequence of the different C-O and C-S bond lengths.

  DOI：

  10.1021/jo952169e

文献信息

• Photolysis of Dialkoxy Disulfides:  A Convenient Source of Alkoxy Radicals for Addition to the Sphere of Fullerene C₆₀
  作者：R. Borghi、L. Lunazzi、G. Placucci、G. Cerioni、A. Plumitallo

  DOI：10.1021/jo952169e

  日期：1996.1.1

  Photolysis of dialkoxy disulfides ROSSOR (R = Me, Et, i-Pr, t-Bu, i-PrCH2, t-BuCH(2)) yields the radicals RO(.), ROS(.), and ROS(.)=O that were identified on the basis of product analysis and spin trapping techniques. It has been shown that only the alkoxy radicals RO(.), produced from ROSSOR, add to the sphere of fullerene C-60 in steady state conditions to yield the RO-C-60(.) adducts which can be detected by ESR spectroscopy. The different trend of the hydrogen splitting constants in the RO-C-60(.) with respect to the corresponding RS-C-60(.) adducts previously reported has been interpreted as a consequence of the different C-O and C-S bond lengths.