摩熵化学
数据库官网
小程序
打开微信扫一扫
首页 分子通 化学资讯 化学百科 反应查询 关于我们
请输入关键词

3β-Acetamino-cholest-4-en | 66500-89-8

中文名称
——
中文别名
——
英文名称
3β-Acetamino-cholest-4-en
英文别名
N-cholest-4-en-3β-yl-acetamide;N-Cholest-4-en-3β-yl-acetamid;3β-Acetamino-cholesten-(4);N-[(3S,8S,9S,10R,13R,14S,17R)-10,13-dimethyl-17-[(2R)-6-methylheptan-2-yl]-2,3,6,7,8,9,11,12,14,15,16,17-dodecahydro-1H-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-yl]acetamide
3β-Acetamino-cholest-4-en化学式
CAS
66500-89-8
化学式
C29H49NO
mdl
——
分子量
427.714
InChiKey
XGOWVOGITDLHGV-VEVYEIKRSA-N
BEILSTEIN
——
EINECS
——
  • 物化性质
  • 计算性质
  • ADMET
  • 安全信息
  • SDS
  • 制备方法与用途
  • 上下游信息
  • 反应信息
  • 文献信息
  • 表征谱图
  • 同类化合物
  • 相关功能分类
  • 相关结构分类

计算性质

  • 辛醇/水分配系数(LogP):
    8.6
  • 重原子数:
    31
  • 可旋转键数:
    6
  • 环数:
    4.0
  • sp3杂化的碳原子比例:
    0.9
  • 拓扑面积:
    29.1
  • 氢给体数:
    1
  • 氢受体数:
    1

反应信息

  • 作为反应物:
    参考文献:
    名称:
    Shoppee et al., Journal of the Chemical Society, 1956, p. 1649,1653
    摘要:
    DOI:
  • 作为产物:
    参考文献:
    名称:
    Adverse reactions associated with echinacea: the Australian experience
    摘要:
    Background: Fifty percent of Australians use complementary and alternative medicines (other than vitamins) in any 12-month period, of which echinacea-containing products are increasingly popular. Recent reports have highlighted the risk of allergic reactions to complementary medicines in atopic patients.Objective: To determine the characteristics of adverse reactions linked to use of the popular herbal remedy echinacea.Methods: Five privately referred patients were evaluated by the authors in their office practice via skin prick testing (SPT) on the volar aspect of the forearm and radioallergosorbent test after adverse reactions to echinacea. As there was little published information on adverse reactions to echinacea, reports to the Australian Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee were reviewed. Those suggestive of possible allergic reactions were evaluated in greater detail by anonymously surveying the healthcare professionals who had reported the cases and from one unreported case. Serum was collected for further analysis where possible.Results: Five cases of adverse reactions to echinacea were personally evaluated by the authors. Two patients suffered anaphylaxis and a third had an acute asthma attack 10 minutes after their first ever dose of echinacea. The fourth patient suffered recurrent episodes of mild asthma each time echinacea was ingested, and the fifth developed a maculopapular rash within 2 days of ingestion which recurred when rechallenged. Three of the patients had positive SPT results. Three reported repeated spontaneous "challenges" and symptoms after further ingestion of echinacea. Fifty-one Australian adverse drug reports implicating echinacea were also reviewed. There were 26 cases suggestive of possible immumoglobulin E-mediated hypersensitivity (4 anaphylaxis, 12 acute asthma, 10 urticaria/angioedema). Of these 26 patients, age ranged from 2 to 58 years, 78% were female and >50% were known to be atopic. Four were hospitalized, 4 reacted after their first known exposure, and I patient suffered multiple progressive systemic reactions. Twenty percent of 100 atopic subjects who had never taken echinacea also had positive SPT results to this substance when tested by one of the authors in his office practice.Conclusion: Some atopic subjects have positive SPT results to echinacea in the absence of known exposure. Atopic subjects are also overrepresented in those experiencing reactions to echinacea. The possibility that cross-reactivity between echinacea and other environmental allergens may trigger allergic reactions in "echinacea-naYve" subjects is supported by the Australian data. Given its widespread (and largely unsupervised) community use, even rare adverse events become inevitable. Atopic patients should be cautioned appropriately.
    DOI:
    10.1016/s1081-1206(10)63591-0
点击查看最新优质反应信息

文献信息

  • STEROIDS: III. THE EPIMERIC N-ACETYL-3-AMINOCHOLEST-4- AND -5-ENES
    作者:R. A. B. Bannard、A. F. McKay
    DOI:10.1139/v55-137
    日期:1955.6.1

    Lithium aluminum hydride reduction of the oximes of 3-ketocholest-4- and -5-enes gave mixtures of amines. These amines on acetylation and separation gave respectively N-acetyI-3(α)-aminocholest-5-ene, N-acetyl-3(β) aminocholest-5-ene, N-acetyl-3(α)-aminocholest-4-ene, and N-acetyl-3(β)-aminocholest-4-ene. The N-acetyl-3(α)-aminocholest-5-ene (m.p. 184.5 °C.) was shown to be identical with the cholesterylacetamide obtained by the acetylation of the degradation product from N-benzyl-3(α)-aminocholest-5-ene (m.p. 90-91 °C).

    3-酮胆甾-4-烯和-5-烯的肟经过氢化铝锂还原后,产生了混合胺。这些胺在乙酰化和分离后分别得到N-乙酰基-3(α)-氨基胆甾-5-烯,N-乙酰基-3(β)氨基胆甾-5-烯,N-乙酰基-3(α)-氨基胆甾-4-烯和N-乙酰基-3(β)-氨基胆甾-4-烯。N-乙酰基-3(α)-氨基胆甾-5-烯(熔点184.5℃)被证明与从N-苯甲基-3(α)-氨基胆甾-5-烯(熔点90-91℃)的降解产物乙酰化得到的胆固醇乙酰胺相同。
  • Adverse reactions associated with echinacea: the Australian experience
    作者:Raymond J. Mullins、Robert Heddle
    DOI:10.1016/s1081-1206(10)63591-0
    日期:2002.1
    Background: Fifty percent of Australians use complementary and alternative medicines (other than vitamins) in any 12-month period, of which echinacea-containing products are increasingly popular. Recent reports have highlighted the risk of allergic reactions to complementary medicines in atopic patients.Objective: To determine the characteristics of adverse reactions linked to use of the popular herbal remedy echinacea.Methods: Five privately referred patients were evaluated by the authors in their office practice via skin prick testing (SPT) on the volar aspect of the forearm and radioallergosorbent test after adverse reactions to echinacea. As there was little published information on adverse reactions to echinacea, reports to the Australian Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee were reviewed. Those suggestive of possible allergic reactions were evaluated in greater detail by anonymously surveying the healthcare professionals who had reported the cases and from one unreported case. Serum was collected for further analysis where possible.Results: Five cases of adverse reactions to echinacea were personally evaluated by the authors. Two patients suffered anaphylaxis and a third had an acute asthma attack 10 minutes after their first ever dose of echinacea. The fourth patient suffered recurrent episodes of mild asthma each time echinacea was ingested, and the fifth developed a maculopapular rash within 2 days of ingestion which recurred when rechallenged. Three of the patients had positive SPT results. Three reported repeated spontaneous "challenges" and symptoms after further ingestion of echinacea. Fifty-one Australian adverse drug reports implicating echinacea were also reviewed. There were 26 cases suggestive of possible immumoglobulin E-mediated hypersensitivity (4 anaphylaxis, 12 acute asthma, 10 urticaria/angioedema). Of these 26 patients, age ranged from 2 to 58 years, 78% were female and >50% were known to be atopic. Four were hospitalized, 4 reacted after their first known exposure, and I patient suffered multiple progressive systemic reactions. Twenty percent of 100 atopic subjects who had never taken echinacea also had positive SPT results to this substance when tested by one of the authors in his office practice.Conclusion: Some atopic subjects have positive SPT results to echinacea in the absence of known exposure. Atopic subjects are also overrepresented in those experiencing reactions to echinacea. The possibility that cross-reactivity between echinacea and other environmental allergens may trigger allergic reactions in "echinacea-naYve" subjects is supported by the Australian data. Given its widespread (and largely unsupervised) community use, even rare adverse events become inevitable. Atopic patients should be cautioned appropriately.
  • Shoppee et al., Journal of the Chemical Society, 1956, p. 1649,1653
    作者:Shoppee et al.
    DOI:——
    日期:——
查看更多