Pharmacological examination of contractile responses of the guinea-pig isolated ileum produced by μ-opioid receptor antagonists in the presence of, and following exposure to, morphine
作者:M K Mundey、A Ali、R Mason、V G Wilson
DOI:10.1038/sj.bjp.0703659
日期:2000.11
We have assessed the potential of several μ‐opioid receptor antagonists to elicit a response in the guinea‐pig isolated ileum in the presence of, and following overnight exposure to, morphine.
Naloxone, D‐Phe‐Cys‐Tyr‐D‐Trp‐Orn‐Thr‐Pen‐Thr‐NH2 (CTOP), (−)‐5,9α‐diethyl‐2‐(3‐furyl‐methyl)‐2′‐hydroxy‐6,7‐benzomorphan (MR2266), but not D‐Phe‐Cys‐Tyr‐D‐Trp‐Arg‐Thr‐Pen‐Thr‐NH2 (CTAP), produced a transient inhibition of electrically‐evoked contractions of the guinea‐pig ileum. The effect of 1 μM CTOP, but not that to MR2266, was inhibited by 1 μM somatostatin.
Naloxone (0.3 μM), CTOP (3 μM), CTAP (3 μM) and MR2266 (0.3 μM) antagonized the inhibitory effect of morphine on electrically‐evoked contractions of the guinea‐pig to a similar degree and, following 60 min exposure to morphine, produced non‐sustained contractions. The response to 3 μM CTOP was significantly smaller than that to 3 μM CTAP. None of the antagonists produced a response in the absence of morphine.
Following overnight exposure of the ileum to 0.3 μM morphine (4°C), and repeated washing to remove the agonist, all four antagonists elicited non‐sustained contractions. However, the responses to 3 μM CTOP and 0.3 μM MR2266 were significantly smaller than those elicited by 0.3 μM naloxone and 3 μM CTAP. Somatostatin (1 μM) significantly reduced naloxone‐induced contractions, but not those to CTAP.
While all four μ‐opioid antagonists elicited contractions in the presence of, and following prolonged exposure to, morphine, differences between them were noted which may be a consequence of non‐opioid actions.
British Journal of Pharmacology (2000) 131, 893–902; doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0703659
我们评估了多种μ‐阿片受体拮抗剂在 Guinea 猪离体回肠中诱发反应的潜力,这些测试是在有吗啡存在的情况下,以及在经过一夜吗啡预处理后进行的。
纳洛酮、CTOP、MR2266,但不包括 CTAP,在 Guinea 猪回肠中诱发了短暂的电刺激收缩抑制。1 μM CTOP 的作用被 1 μM 生长抑素抑制,而 MR2266 的作用未受抑制。
纳洛酮(0.3 μM)、CTOP(3 μM)、CTAP(3 μM)和 MR2266(0.3 μM)均以类似程度拮抗了吗啡对 Guinea 猪回肠电刺激收缩的抑制作用。经过 60 分钟吗啡处理后,拮抗剂诱发了非持续性收缩。在同样的浓度下,CTOP 诱发的反应明显小于 CTAP。在没有吗啡的情况下,所有拮抗剂均未诱发反应。
经过一夜的 0.3 μM 吗啡预处理(4°C),并经过多次清洗以去除激动剂后,四种拮抗剂均诱发了非持续性收缩。然而,3 μM CTOP 和 0.3 μM MR2266 诱发的反应显著小于 0.3 μM 纳洛酮和 3 μM CTAP 诱发的反应。生长抑素(1 μM)显著抑制了纳洛酮诱发的收缩,但未抑制 CTAP 诱发的收缩。
虽然所有四种 μ-阿片受体拮抗剂均可在吗啡存在下以及长期吗啡处理后诱发收缩,但它们之间存在差异,这可能是由于非阿片作用所致。
《英国药理学杂志》(2000 年)第 131 卷,893–902 页;DOI:10.1038/sj.bjp.0703659