摩熵化学
数据库官网
小程序
打开微信扫一扫
首页 分子通 化学资讯 化学百科 反应查询 关于我们
请输入关键词

6-hydroxyimino-5-oxo-heptanoic acid | 118661-55-5

中文名称
——
中文别名
——
英文名称
6-hydroxyimino-5-oxo-heptanoic acid
英文别名
6-Hydroxyimino-5-oxo-heptansaeure
6-hydroxyimino-5-oxo-heptanoic acid化学式
CAS
118661-55-5
化学式
C7H11NO4
mdl
——
分子量
173.169
InChiKey
LGEIXWGNCPJGNU-VMPITWQZSA-N
BEILSTEIN
——
EINECS
——
  • 物化性质
  • 计算性质
  • ADMET
  • 安全信息
  • SDS
  • 制备方法与用途
  • 上下游信息
  • 反应信息
  • 文献信息
  • 表征谱图
  • 同类化合物
  • 相关功能分类
  • 相关结构分类

计算性质

  • 辛醇/水分配系数(LogP):
    0.66
  • 重原子数:
    12.0
  • 可旋转键数:
    5.0
  • 环数:
    0.0
  • sp3杂化的碳原子比例:
    0.57
  • 拓扑面积:
    86.96
  • 氢给体数:
    2.0
  • 氢受体数:
    4.0

反应信息

  • 作为反应物:
    参考文献:
    名称:
    Stetter et al., Chemische Berichte, 1958, vol. 91, p. 2882,2884
    摘要:
    DOI:
  • 作为产物:
    描述:
    2-甲基-1,3-环己二酮四氢呋喃盐酸 、 sodium nitrite 作用下, 生成 6-hydroxyimino-5-oxo-heptanoic acid
    参考文献:
    名称:
    Improvement in quality of life of dialysis patients during six months of exercise
    摘要:
    Quality of life (QOL) assessment has rapidly become an integral variable of outcome in clinical research; over 1,000 new articles each year are indexed under "quality of life" (1). Despite the proliferation of instruments and the burgeoning theoretical literature devoted to QOL evaluation, no unified approach has been derived for its measurement, and little agreement has been attained on what it means (2). Lack of clarity regarding the definition of QOL has led to several related concepts, namely functional status, life-satisfaction, well-being, and health status, being used interchangeably with QOL (3), further contributing to ambiguity. Compared to the general population, patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) experience a poorer QOL (4). Questionnaire-based QOL measurement in ESRD has demonstrated that QOL is best in renal transplantation and worst in unit-based haemodialysis. The main determinants of difference are the physical function domains. QOL in ESRD has traditionally been measured by a number of disease-specific, domain-specific and generic instruments, all exhibiting a fixed design. However, the fixed nature of the aforementioned instruments, is problematic in that what is measured is predetermined and hence may not represent the free choice of the individual whose QOL is assessed (5). Questionnaire-based instruments may not reflect individual priorities.
    DOI:
    10.1111/j.1755-6686.2002.tb00189.x
点击查看最新优质反应信息