作者:Simon J. Hocart、Rahul Jain、William A. Murphy、John E. Taylor、David H. Coy
DOI:10.1021/jm9806289
日期:1999.6.1
The search for synthetic analogues of somatostatin (SRIF) which exhibit selective affinities for the five known receptor subtypes (sst(1-5)) has generated a large number of potent agonist analogues. Many of these agonists display good subtype selectivities and affinities for the subtypes 2, 3, and 5, with very few selective for sst(1) or sst(4). Until the recent report by Bass and co-workers (Mol. Pharmacol. 1996, 50, 709-715; erratum Mel. Pharmacol. 1997, 51, 170), no true antagonists of somatostatin had been discovered, let alone any displaying differential receptor subtype selectivity. In this present study, we further explore the effect of this putative L,D-5(6) antagonist motif on somatostatin octapeptide analogues with a cyclic hexapeptide core. The most potent antagonist found to date is H-Cpa-cyclo[DCys-Tyr-DTrp-Lys-Thr-Cys]-Nal-NH2, PRL-2970 (21), which has an IC50 Of 1.1 nM in a rat pituitary growth hormone in vitro antagonist assay versus SRIF (1 nM). This analogue bound to cloned human somatostatin subtype 2 receptors with a K-i of 26 nM. The highest hsst(2) affinity analogue was H-Cpa-cyclo[DCys-Pal-DTrp-Lys-Tle-Cys]-Nal-NH2, PRL-2915 (15), with a K-i of 12 nM (IC50 = 1.8 nM). This analogue was also selective for hsst(2) over hsst(3) and hsst(5) by factors of 8 and 40, respectively, and had no agonist activity when tested alone at concentrations up to 10 mu M. Regression analysis of the binding affinities versus the observed antagonist potencies revealed high correlations for hsst(2) (r = 0.65) and hsst(3) (r = 0.52) with a less significant correlation to hsst5 (r = 0.40). This is quite different from the somatostatin agonist analogues which show a highly significant correlation to hsst(2) (r > 0.9). Receptor-selective somatostatin antagonists should provide valuable tools for characterizing the many important physiological functions of this neuropeptide.