Synthesis, in vitro antiurease, in vivo antinematodal activity of quinoline analogs and their in-silico study
作者:Khalid Zaman、Fazal Rahim、Muhammad Taha、Muhammad Sajid、Shawkat Hayat、Muhammad Nawaz、Mohammed Salahuddin、Naveed Iqbal、Naqeeb Ullah Khan、Syed Adnan Ali Shah、Rai Khalid Farooq、Ali Bahadar、Abdul Wadood、Khalid Mohammed Khan
DOI:10.1016/j.bioorg.2021.105199
日期:2021.10
in which analog 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, and 11 (IC50 = 3.50 ± 0.10, 7.20 ± 0.20, 1.30 ± 0.10, 2.30 ± 0.10, 0.60 ± 0.01, 1.05 ± 0.10 and 2.60 ± 0.10 µM respectively) were appeared the most potent ones among the series. In this context, most potent analogs such as 1, 3, 4, 8, and 9 were further subjected for their in vitro antinematodal study against C. elegans to examine its cytotoxicity under positive control
喹啉类似物的合成及其脲酶抑制活性参考标准药物硫脲 (IC 50 = 21.86 ± 0.40 µM) 在本研究中进行。抑制活性范围为 (IC 50 = 0.60 ± 0.01 至 24.10 ± 0.70 µM),表明它是最有效的脲酶抑制剂类别。模拟1 - 9,和11 - 13出现具有比硫脲大很多倍antiurease潜力,其中模拟1,2,3,4,8,9,和11(IC 50 = 3.50 ± 0.10, 7.20 ± 0.20, 1.30 ± 0.10, 2.30 ± 0.10, 0.60 ± 0.01, 1.05 ± 0.10 and 2.60 ± 0.10 µM) 是最有效的。在这种情况下,最有效的类似物,例如1,3,4,8,和9进一步进行它们的体外抗抗线虫研究线虫以检查其标准药物,左旋咪唑的阳性控制下的细胞毒性。因此,细胞毒性曲线显示的类似物3,8,和9中发现与在较高浓度(500