{4-[3-Methyl-1-(2-morpholin-4-yl-ethyl)-2,4-dioxo-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidin-6-yl]-phenoxy}-acetic acid | 875802-30-5

• 分子结构分类: 有机化合物 - 有机杂环化合物 - 吡咯
• 英文名称: {4-[3-Methyl-1-(2-morpholin-4-yl-ethyl)-2,4-dioxo-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidin-6-yl]-phenoxy}-acetic acid
• 英文别名: 2-[4-[3-methyl-1-(2-morpholin-4-ylethyl)-2,4-dioxo-5H-pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidin-6-yl]phenoxy]acetic acid
• CAS: 875802-30-5
• 化学式: C₂₁H₂₄N₄O₆
• 分子量: 428.445
• InChiKey: VBGPJSSMTKOSHT-UHFFFAOYSA-N

计算性质

• 辛醇/水分配系数(LogP)：
  -1.5
• 重原子数：
  31
• 可旋转键数：
  7
• 环数：
  4.0
• sp3杂化的碳原子比例：
  0.38
• 拓扑面积：
  115
• 氢给体数：
  2
• 氢受体数：
  7

反应信息

• 作为反应物：
  描述：

  {4-[3-Methyl-1-(2-morpholin-4-yl-ethyl)-2,4-dioxo-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidin-6-yl]-phenoxy}-acetic acid 、 4-氟苯胺 在 polymer-bound morpholine 、 1-羟基苯并三唑 、 盐酸-N-乙基-Nˊ-(3-二甲氨基丙基)碳二亚胺 作用下， 以 N,N-二甲基甲酰胺 为溶剂， 以80%的产率得到N-(4-Fluoro-phenyl)-2-{4-[3-methyl-1-(2-morpholin-4-yl-ethyl)-2,4-dioxo-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidin-6-yl]-phenoxy}-acetamide
  参考文献：
  名称：

  Design, Synthesis, and Structure−Activity Relationships of 1-,3-,8-, and 9-Substituted-9-deazaxanthines at the Human A_2B Adenosine Receptor

  摘要：

  Over two hundred 1-, 3-, 8-, and 9-substituted-9-deazaxanthines were prepared and evaluated for their binding affinity at the recombinant human adenosine receptors, in particular at the hA(2B) and hA(2A) subtypes. Several ligands endowed with sub-micromolar to low nanomolar binding affinity at hA(2B) receptors, good selectivity over hA(2A) and hA(3), but a relatively poor selectivity over hA(1) were obtained. Good antagonistic potencies and efficacies, with pA(2) values close to the corresponding pK(i)s, were observed in functional assays in vitro performed on a selected series of compounds. 1,3-Dimethyl-8-phenoxy-(N-p-halogenophenyl)-acetamido-9-deazaxanthine derivatives appeared as the most interesting leads, some of them showing outstanding hA(2B) affinities, high selectivity over hA(2A) and hA(3), but low selectivity over hA(1). Structure-affinity relationships suggested that the binding potency at the hA(2B) receptor was mainly modulated by the steric (lipophilic) properties of the substituents at positions 1 and 3 and by the electronic and lipophilic characteristics of the substituents at position 8. A comparison among affinity and selectivity profiles of 9-deazaxanthines with the corresponding xanthines suggested some possible differences in their binding mode.

  DOI：

  10.1021/jm0506221
• 作为产物：
  描述：

  4-甲酰苯氧基乙酸 在 哌啶 、 甲酸 、 sodium dithionite 作用下， 以 1,4-二氧六环 为溶剂， 生成 {4-[3-Methyl-1-(2-morpholin-4-yl-ethyl)-2,4-dioxo-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidin-6-yl]-phenoxy}-acetic acid
  参考文献：
  名称：

  Design, Synthesis, and Structure−Activity Relationships of 1-,3-,8-, and 9-Substituted-9-deazaxanthines at the Human A_2B Adenosine Receptor

  摘要：

  Over two hundred 1-, 3-, 8-, and 9-substituted-9-deazaxanthines were prepared and evaluated for their binding affinity at the recombinant human adenosine receptors, in particular at the hA(2B) and hA(2A) subtypes. Several ligands endowed with sub-micromolar to low nanomolar binding affinity at hA(2B) receptors, good selectivity over hA(2A) and hA(3), but a relatively poor selectivity over hA(1) were obtained. Good antagonistic potencies and efficacies, with pA(2) values close to the corresponding pK(i)s, were observed in functional assays in vitro performed on a selected series of compounds. 1,3-Dimethyl-8-phenoxy-(N-p-halogenophenyl)-acetamido-9-deazaxanthine derivatives appeared as the most interesting leads, some of them showing outstanding hA(2B) affinities, high selectivity over hA(2A) and hA(3), but low selectivity over hA(1). Structure-affinity relationships suggested that the binding potency at the hA(2B) receptor was mainly modulated by the steric (lipophilic) properties of the substituents at positions 1 and 3 and by the electronic and lipophilic characteristics of the substituents at position 8. A comparison among affinity and selectivity profiles of 9-deazaxanthines with the corresponding xanthines suggested some possible differences in their binding mode.

  DOI：

  10.1021/jm0506221