Thermal and Light‐Induced Spin Transitions of Fe
II
Complexes with 4‐ and 5‐(Phenylazo)‐2,2′‐bipyridine Ligands: Intra‐ vs. Intermolecular Effects
摘要:
AbstractFive new spin crossover complexes with 4‐ and 5‐(phenylazo)‐2,2‐bipyridine (4‐/5‐PAbipy) ligands were synthesized and investigated with respect to their spin crossover (SCO) behavior. The results are compared to the thermal and light‐induced spin transition properties of the parent SCO complexes [Fe(bpz)2(bipy)] (1) and [Fe(bipy)2(NCS)2] (2). [Fe(bpz)2(4‐PAbipy)] (1a) undergoes a stepwise spin transition whereas [Fe(bpz)2(5‐PAbipy)] (1b) exhibits a one‐step transition with a 6 K‐wide hysteresis. For [Fe(bpz)2(tBu5‐PAbipy)] (1c) the spin transition to the low‐spin state is incomplete. Qualitatively similar changes of the SCO behavior are observed for the complexes [Fe(4‐PAbipy)2(NCS)2] (2a) and [Fe(5‐PAbipy)2(NCS)2] (2b). In comparison to the parent system 2, a strengthening of intermolecular interactions leads to a stabilization of the low‐spin state. Evidence for the LIESST behavior could be obtained for all new compounds by means of magnetic susceptibility measurements as well as UV/Vis and resonance Raman spectroscopy.
Thermal and Light‐Induced Spin Transitions of Fe
II
Complexes with 4‐ and 5‐(Phenylazo)‐2,2′‐bipyridine Ligands: Intra‐ vs. Intermolecular Effects
摘要:
AbstractFive new spin crossover complexes with 4‐ and 5‐(phenylazo)‐2,2‐bipyridine (4‐/5‐PAbipy) ligands were synthesized and investigated with respect to their spin crossover (SCO) behavior. The results are compared to the thermal and light‐induced spin transition properties of the parent SCO complexes [Fe(bpz)2(bipy)] (1) and [Fe(bipy)2(NCS)2] (2). [Fe(bpz)2(4‐PAbipy)] (1a) undergoes a stepwise spin transition whereas [Fe(bpz)2(5‐PAbipy)] (1b) exhibits a one‐step transition with a 6 K‐wide hysteresis. For [Fe(bpz)2(tBu5‐PAbipy)] (1c) the spin transition to the low‐spin state is incomplete. Qualitatively similar changes of the SCO behavior are observed for the complexes [Fe(4‐PAbipy)2(NCS)2] (2a) and [Fe(5‐PAbipy)2(NCS)2] (2b). In comparison to the parent system 2, a strengthening of intermolecular interactions leads to a stabilization of the low‐spin state. Evidence for the LIESST behavior could be obtained for all new compounds by means of magnetic susceptibility measurements as well as UV/Vis and resonance Raman spectroscopy.
Thermal and Light‐Induced Spin Transitions of Fe
<sup>II</sup>
Complexes with 4‐ and 5‐(Phenylazo)‐2,2′‐bipyridine Ligands: Intra‐ vs. Intermolecular Effects
作者:Sven Olaf Schmidt、Holger Naggert、Axel Buchholz、Hannah Brandenburg、Alexander Bannwarth、Winfried Plass、Felix Tuczek
DOI:10.1002/ejic.201501252
日期:2016.5
AbstractFive new spin crossover complexes with 4‐ and 5‐(phenylazo)‐2,2‐bipyridine (4‐/5‐PAbipy) ligands were synthesized and investigated with respect to their spin crossover (SCO) behavior. The results are compared to the thermal and light‐induced spin transition properties of the parent SCO complexes [Fe(bpz)2(bipy)] (1) and [Fe(bipy)2(NCS)2] (2). [Fe(bpz)2(4‐PAbipy)] (1a) undergoes a stepwise spin transition whereas [Fe(bpz)2(5‐PAbipy)] (1b) exhibits a one‐step transition with a 6 K‐wide hysteresis. For [Fe(bpz)2(tBu5‐PAbipy)] (1c) the spin transition to the low‐spin state is incomplete. Qualitatively similar changes of the SCO behavior are observed for the complexes [Fe(4‐PAbipy)2(NCS)2] (2a) and [Fe(5‐PAbipy)2(NCS)2] (2b). In comparison to the parent system 2, a strengthening of intermolecular interactions leads to a stabilization of the low‐spin state. Evidence for the LIESST behavior could be obtained for all new compounds by means of magnetic susceptibility measurements as well as UV/Vis and resonance Raman spectroscopy.