[(diethyl-methyl-silanyl)-methyl]-malonic acid diethyl ester | 18406-80-9

• 分子结构分类: 有机化合物 - 脂质和类脂质分子 - 脂肪酰基
• 英文名称: [(diethyl-methyl-silanyl)-methyl]-malonic acid diethyl ester
• 英文别名: [(Diaethyl-methyl-silyl)-methyl]-malonsaeure-diaethylester；Diethyl [(diethylmethylsilyl]methyl]malonate；diethyl 2-[[diethyl(methyl)silyl]methyl]propanedioate
• CAS: 18406-80-9
• 化学式: C₁₃H₂₆O₄Si
• 分子量: 274.433
• InChiKey: RVMCRLDVXMWLTJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N

计算性质

• 辛醇/水分配系数(LogP)：
  2.85
• 重原子数：
  18
• 可旋转键数：
  10
• 环数：
  0.0
• sp3杂化的碳原子比例：
  0.85
• 拓扑面积：
  52.6
• 氢给体数：
  0
• 氢受体数：
  4

反应信息

• 作为反应物：
  描述：

  [(diethyl-methyl-silanyl)-methyl]-malonic acid diethyl ester 生成 3-(diethyl-methyl-silanyl)-propionic acid triethylsilanyl ester
  参考文献：
  名称：

  与镓基修复材料相关的牙科术后敏感性

  摘要：

  Introduction This study forms part of a 2-year longitudinal clinical trial to compare the performance of a gallium-based restorative material (Galloy) with a high copper, mercury based (Dispersalloy) control material.Method Following Ethical Committee approval, 25 galley restorations and 25 Dispersalloy controls were placed in 14 adult patients, by a single operator. The cavities were of moderate size, indicating the use of amalgam as the restorative material. All restorations were polished within 1 week of placement, photographed and a silicone impression of the tooth and restoration recorded. In addition, a visual analogue scale (VAS), indicating the extent of any post-operative sensitivity, was completed by each patient for each restoration, immediately prior to polishing. A score of 0 indicated no sensitivity, while a score of 10 indicated the greatest possible sensitivity. At B-month recall, the VAS scores, silicone impressions and photographs were repeated.Results The mean sensitivity scores for the galley and Dispersalloy restorations at 1 week were 5.1 (+/-3.4) and 1.0 (+/-1.5), respectively and at 6 months, 1.8 (+/-3.0) and 0.2 (+/-0.1) respectively. The differences between these means at 1 week and at 6 months were significant (P < 0.01).Conclusion Galley restorations were associated with a much greater severity of post-operative sensitivity than Dispersalloy restorations.

  DOI：

  10.1038/sj.bdj.4800755a
• 作为产物：
  描述：

  氯甲基二乙基甲基硅烷 、 丙二酸二乙酯 生成 [(diethyl-methyl-silanyl)-methyl]-malonic acid diethyl ester
  参考文献：
  名称：

  与镓基修复材料相关的牙科术后敏感性

  摘要：

  Introduction This study forms part of a 2-year longitudinal clinical trial to compare the performance of a gallium-based restorative material (Galloy) with a high copper, mercury based (Dispersalloy) control material.Method Following Ethical Committee approval, 25 galley restorations and 25 Dispersalloy controls were placed in 14 adult patients, by a single operator. The cavities were of moderate size, indicating the use of amalgam as the restorative material. All restorations were polished within 1 week of placement, photographed and a silicone impression of the tooth and restoration recorded. In addition, a visual analogue scale (VAS), indicating the extent of any post-operative sensitivity, was completed by each patient for each restoration, immediately prior to polishing. A score of 0 indicated no sensitivity, while a score of 10 indicated the greatest possible sensitivity. At B-month recall, the VAS scores, silicone impressions and photographs were repeated.Results The mean sensitivity scores for the galley and Dispersalloy restorations at 1 week were 5.1 (+/-3.4) and 1.0 (+/-1.5), respectively and at 6 months, 1.8 (+/-3.0) and 0.2 (+/-0.1) respectively. The differences between these means at 1 week and at 6 months were significant (P < 0.01).Conclusion Galley restorations were associated with a much greater severity of post-operative sensitivity than Dispersalloy restorations.

  DOI：

  10.1038/sj.bdj.4800755a