Chloracetyl-peroxid | 14295-66-0

• 分子结构分类: 有机化合物 - 有机酸及其衍生物 - 羧酸及其衍生物
• 英文名称: Chloracetyl-peroxid
• 英文别名: Chloroacetyl peroxide；(2-chloroacetyl) 2-chloroethaneperoxoate
• CAS: 14295-66-0
• 化学式: C₄H₄Cl₂O₄
• 分子量: 186.979
• InChiKey: UAHNNBOKPMGCOS-UHFFFAOYSA-N

物化性质

• 沸点：
  208.3±50.0 °C(Predicted)
• 密度：
  1.504±0.06 g/cm3(Predicted)

计算性质

• 辛醇/水分配系数(LogP)：
  1.4
• 重原子数：
  10
• 可旋转键数：
  5
• 环数：
  0.0
• sp3杂化的碳原子比例：
  0.5
• 拓扑面积：
  52.6
• 氢给体数：
  0
• 氢受体数：
  4

反应信息

• 作为反应物：
  描述：

  盐酸 、 Chloracetyl-peroxid 生成 二氯甲烷
  参考文献：
  名称：

  Panizzon, Helvetica Chimica Acta, 1932, vol. 15, p. 1191

  摘要：

  DOI：
• 作为产物：
  描述：

  氯乙酰氯 在 吡啶 、 双氧水 作用下， 生成 Chloracetyl-peroxid
  参考文献：
  名称：

  Panizzon, Helvetica Chimica Acta, 1932, vol. 15, p. 1191

  摘要：

  DOI：

文献信息

• Fieser et al., Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1948, vol. 70, p. 3177
  作者：Fieser et al.

  DOI：——

  日期：——
• Nucleophilic Substitution Reactions at Chloro-Substituted Ozonides and at a Chlorinated Dimeric Peroxide
  作者：Karl Griesbaum、Konrad Schlindwein

  DOI：10.1021/jo00129a055

  日期：1995.12

  Reactions of substituted 3-chloro-(2a-4a) and 3,5-dichloro-1,2,4-trioxolanes (9a, 10a) with AgBF4 in the presence of LiF gave the corresponding fluoro-substituted ozonides (2b-4b and 9b and 10b). Substitutions af some of these chlorinated ozonides by the methoxy and by the acetoxy groups, and of 3,6-dichloro-3,6-dimethyl-1,2,4,5-tetrox (22a) with the acetoxy group have been achieved, too.
• Introduction of organic radicals into quinones
  申请人：FIESER LOUIS F

  公开号：US02398418A1

  公开（公告）日：1946-04-16
• Vanino; Uhlfelder, Chemische Berichte, 1900, vol. 33, p. 1046
  作者：Vanino、Uhlfelder

  DOI：——

  日期：——
• Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task?
  作者：Manuel Perea、Eva Rosa、Consolación Gómez

  DOI：10.3758/bf03195263

  日期：2002.1

  In the go/no-go lexical decision task (LDT), participants are instructed to respond as quickly as they can when a word is presented and not to respond if a nonword is presented. By minimizing part of the response selection process in the experimental task, the impact of response decision time on the obtained lexical decision time is probably reduced relative to the standard yes/no LDT (Gordon, 1983). Experiments 1 and 2 show that the go/no-go LDT is sensitive to the effects of word frequency and associative priming-the magnitude of these effects is similar with the two tasks. More important, the go/no-go LDT has a number of advantages with respect to the "standard" yes/no LDT. It offers faster response times, more accurate responding, and fewer processing demands than does the yes/no task. Accordingly, the go/no-go task appears to be an excellent alternative to the standard yes/no task.