BF4-, ClO4-). It was determined that the measure of coupling derived from electrochemical methods was less reliable than that obtained from spectral methods. Comparative electrochemical studies were undertaken on [M(bpy)2}2(mu-BL)]n+ M=Ru, Os; BL=dpo, dpi-), which revealed substantial differences in DeltaEox (the separation between the redox potentials for the MII-MII/MIII-MII and MII-MIII/MIII-MIII
光谱电
化学研究双核配合物[Ru(bpy)2} 2(mu-dpi-)] n + [bpy =
2,2'-联吡啶]的两种非对映异构形式的间隔电荷转移(I
VCT)特性;dpi- = 4,5-二(2-
吡啶基)
咪唑酸酯]表明
金属间电子偶联的程度(或化合价离域)取决于立体
化学身份。
乙腈/ [(n-
C4H9)4N] B(
C6F5)4}溶液中强缔合阴离子甲
苯磺酸4-
磺酸盐的相对浓度的增加差异性地降低了两种非对映异构体的离域
水平。在电
化学和光谱电
化学技术对[Ru(bpy)2} 2(mu-dpo)] 5+ [dpo = 3,4-di(2-pyridyl)-1)中阴离子诱导的电子定位的比较研究中, 2,5-恶二唑],观察到两种方法之间的差异,其原因是由多种无机阴离子(PF6-,
BF4-,
ClO4-)引起的影响的顺序和程度。可以确定,电
化学方法得出的偶合度量比光谱方法获得的耦合度量更不可靠。对[M(bpy)2}