(4-bromo-phenyl)-carbamic acid-(2-fluoro-ethyl ester) | 370-94-5

• 分子结构分类: 有机化合物 - 苯类化合物 - 苯和取代衍生物
• 英文名称: (4-bromo-phenyl)-carbamic acid-(2-fluoro-ethyl ester)
• 英文别名: (4-Brom-phenyl)-carbamidsaeure-(2-fluor-aethylester)；2-fluoroethyl N-(4-bromophenyl)carbamate
• CAS: 370-94-5
• 化学式: C₉H₉BrFNO₂
• mdl: MFCD00842541
• 分子量: 262.078
• InChiKey: IJMFXUNDKOJTMJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N

物化性质

• 熔点：
  78 °C
• 沸点：
  276.0±25.0 °C(Predicted)
• 密度：
  1.569±0.06 g/cm3(Predicted)

计算性质

• 辛醇/水分配系数(LogP)：
  3
• 重原子数：
  14
• 可旋转键数：
  4
• 环数：
  1.0
• sp3杂化的碳原子比例：
  0.22
• 拓扑面积：
  38.3
• 氢给体数：
  1
• 氢受体数：
  3

反应信息

• 作为产物：
  描述：

  2-氟乙基氯甲酸 、 4-溴苯胺 生成 (4-bromo-phenyl)-carbamic acid-(2-fluoro-ethyl ester)
  参考文献：
  名称：

  Cross-Cultural Perspectives: Implications for Attachment Theory and Family Therapy

  摘要：

  Cross‐cultural perspectives have always been useful for understanding behavior. They clarify the distinction between aspects that are essentially part of the human condition and those that are the most responsive to variation. The interesting article by Rothbaum and his colleagues is in that tradition, contrasting the cultural values and family patterns in Japanese society with those of Western cultures, including our own, and suggesting that these differences shape the nature and course of attachment. It stimulates questions about what we have taken for granted in our theories and in our evaluations of dysfunctional behavior.

  DOI：

  10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.41316.x

文献信息

• Olah et al., Acta Chimica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 1955, vol. 7, p. 443,446
  作者：Olah et al.

  DOI：——

  日期：——
• Cross-Cultural Perspectives: Implications for Attachment Theory and Family Therapy
  作者：Patricia Minuchin

  DOI：10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.41316.x

  日期：2002.9

  Cross‐cultural perspectives have always been useful for understanding behavior. They clarify the distinction between aspects that are essentially part of the human condition and those that are the most responsive to variation. The interesting article by Rothbaum and his colleagues is in that tradition, contrasting the cultural values and family patterns in Japanese society with those of Western cultures, including our own, and suggesting that these differences shape the nature and course of attachment. It stimulates questions about what we have taken for granted in our theories and in our evaluations of dysfunctional behavior.