Bis-(2,3,5,6-tetrahydroxy-4-methyl-phenyl) | 2578-72-5

• 分子结构分类: 有机化合物 - 苯类化合物 - 苯和取代衍生物
• 英文名称: Bis-(2,3,5,6-tetrahydroxy-4-methyl-phenyl)
• 英文别名: 4,4'-Dimethyl-biphenyloctol-(2,3,5,6,2',3',5',6')；2,3,5,6,2',3',5',6'-Octahydroxy-4,4'-dimethyl-biphenyl；4,4'-Dimethyl-biphenyl-2,3,5,6,2',3',5',6'-octaol；4,4a(2)-Dimethyl[1,1a(2)-biphenyl]-2,2a(2),3,3a(2),5,5a(2),6,6a(2)-octol；3-methyl-6-(2,3,5,6-tetrahydroxy-4-methylphenyl)benzene-1,2,4,5-tetrol
• CAS: 2578-72-5
• 化学式: C₁₄H₁₄O₈
• 分子量: 310.26
• InChiKey: PEMZIKTWQLTGBE-UHFFFAOYSA-N

计算性质

• 辛醇/水分配系数(LogP)：
  1.4
• 重原子数：
  22
• 可旋转键数：
  1
• 环数：
  2.0
• sp3杂化的碳原子比例：
  0.14
• 拓扑面积：
  162
• 氢给体数：
  8
• 氢受体数：
  8

反应信息

• 作为产物：
  描述：

  alkaline earth salt of/the/ methylsulfuric acid 在 氢碘酸 作用下， 生成 Bis-(2,3,5,6-tetrahydroxy-4-methyl-phenyl)
  参考文献：
  名称：

  REINVESTED EARNINGS IN THE NATIONAL ACCOUNTS

  摘要：

  The paper raises three questions. Firstly, is it warranted that a significant part of primary (property) income is not shown in the national accounts as being distributed to the owners of the assets to which it accrues but ends up as capital gains in the revaluation account? Secondly, why has the SNA chosen not to record reinvested earnings of corporations as flows of property income with the exception of foreign direct investment, and thirdly why the asymmetrical recording of stock investments constituting more than 10 percent of equity capital depending on whether domestic or foreign transactions are concerned? Reinvested earnings on domestic equity investment above 10 percent of a corporation are not recorded as property income in the system.The paper looks at these three questions from the perspective of the analytical uses of national accounts. The consequences for the analysis of income distribution both between nations and within nations are examined.

  DOI：

  10.1111/j.1475-4991.2000.tb00408.x

文献信息

• REINVESTED EARNINGS IN THE NATIONAL ACCOUNTS
  作者：Esben Dalgaard、Christoffer Eff、Annette Thomsen

  DOI：10.1111/j.1475-4991.2000.tb00408.x

  日期：2000.12

  The paper raises three questions. Firstly, is it warranted that a significant part of primary (property) income is not shown in the national accounts as being distributed to the owners of the assets to which it accrues but ends up as capital gains in the revaluation account? Secondly, why has the SNA chosen not to record reinvested earnings of corporations as flows of property income with the exception of foreign direct investment, and thirdly why the asymmetrical recording of stock investments constituting more than 10 percent of equity capital depending on whether domestic or foreign transactions are concerned? Reinvested earnings on domestic equity investment above 10 percent of a corporation are not recorded as property income in the system.The paper looks at these three questions from the perspective of the analytical uses of national accounts. The consequences for the analysis of income distribution both between nations and within nations are examined.