Psychological reactions and quality of life in patients with posterior uveal melanoma treated with ruthenium plaque therapy or enucleation: A one year follow-up study
Psychological reactions and quality of life in patients with posterior uveal melanoma treated with ruthenium plaque therapy or enucleation: A one year follow-up study
作者:Yvonne Brandberg、Erik Kock、Kristi Oskar、Eva Af Trampe、Stefan Seregard
DOI:10.1038/eye.2000.233
日期:2000.11
Purpose To investigate psychological reactions and quality of life among patients with posterior uveal melanoma. Methods Consecutive patients with uveal malignant melanoma (99/106), referred to st Erik's Eye Hospital 1995â1996, treated with rutheniuim plaque radiotherapy (n = 50) or enucleation (n = 49), were included in this non-randomised prospective comparative study. Questionnaires were completed before treatment (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HAD scale) and 2 and 12 months after diagnosis including the HAD scale, the Impact of Event Scale and the EORTC QLQ-C30. A disease-specific questionnaire was included 12 months after diagnosis. Between-group differences were analysed by chi-square, Student's t-test and ANOVA. Results A majority of the patients reported reduced âQuality of Lifeâ (72â85%), âEmotional functioningâ (60â74%) and âCognitive functioningâ (51â61%). âFatigueâ was the most frequently reported symptom (61â72%) followed by âInsomniaâ (43â58%). Anxiety and depressive symptoms were relatively frequent up to 1 year after treatment, but the levels of anxiety decreased during the first year after treatment. Disease and treatment-related problems were reported in both treatment groups 1 year after diagnosis. Enucleated patients had more problems with appearance and judging distances, whereas those treated with radiotherapy reported vision impairment to a higher extent. Conclusion Enucleated patients reported high levels of emotional distress, problems with appearance and judging distances during the first year after treatment. Patients treated with radiotherapy reported similar levels of quality of life and emotional problems, but more problems with visual impairment. These differences in impact on disease-related functioning should be taken into account when treatment options are discussed.