m-hydroxybenzaldazine | 41097-50-1

• 分子结构分类: 有机化合物 - 苯类化合物 - 酚类
• 英文名称: m-hydroxybenzaldazine
• 英文别名: bis-(3-hydroxy-benzylidene)-hydrazine；Bis-(3-hydroxy-benzyliden)-hydrazin；3-hydroxy-benzaldehyde, [(3-hydroxyphenyl)methylene]hydrazone；3-Hydroxybenzaldehyde azine；3-[(E)-[(E)-(3-hydroxyphenyl)methylidenehydrazinylidene]methyl]phenol
• CAS: 41097-50-1
• 化学式: C₁₄H₁₂N₂O₂
• 分子量: 240.261
• InChiKey: RNYGIOAXUUJHOC-KAVGSWPWSA-N

计算性质

• 辛醇/水分配系数(LogP)：
  2.6
• 重原子数：
  18
• 可旋转键数：
  3
• 环数：
  2.0
• sp3杂化的碳原子比例：
  0.0
• 拓扑面积：
  65.2
• 氢给体数：
  2
• 氢受体数：
  4

反应信息

• 作为产物：
  描述：

  间羟基苯甲醛 在 一水合肼 作用下， 以 乙醇 为溶剂， 反应 1.0h， 生成 m-hydroxybenzaldazine
  参考文献：
  名称：

  Aspects of acyclic azine chemistry—I. The effect of structure and solvents on the electronic absorption spectra of benzaldazine, o-, m- and p-hydroxybenzaldazines

  摘要：

  DOI：

  10.1016/0584-8539(80)80117-6

文献信息

• Noelting, Annales de Chimie (Cachan, France), 1910, vol. <8> 19, p. 479,494
  作者：Noelting

  DOI：——

  日期：——
• The Absorption Spectra of Certain Aldazines
  作者：Elkan R. Blout、Ralph M. Gofstein

  DOI：10.1021/ja01217a005

  日期：1945.1
• Curtius, Journal fur praktische Chemie (Leipzig 1954), 1912, vol. <2> 85, p. 418
  作者：Curtius

  DOI：——

  日期：——
• Barany; Braude; Pianka, Journal of the Chemical Society, 1949, p. 1899
  作者：Barany、Braude、Pianka

  DOI：——

  日期：——
• Negotiating the Public Sphere through Private Correspondence: A Woman’s Letters of Liberty in Eighteenth-Century Germany
  作者：Melanie Archangeli

  DOI：10.1111/1468-0483.00178

  日期：2000.10

  The pivotal role played by letters in eighteenth‐century German literary, cultural and everyday life has long been recognised. In contrast to earlier times, many of the letters written in the eighteenth century were composed by women, and their correspondence provides modern scholars with a rich source of information abour the process of communication in the intimate, private and public spheres. The linited correspondence of Charlotte von Hezel, the first woman in Germany to edit a periodical under her own name, is of particular interest because it offers one of the few examaples of a woman corresponding with men for professional, not personal reasons. In addition, Hezel, not her male correspondents, represents the voice of authority within the area of activity being discussed: the publication of her magazine. Hezel’s self‐assurance is remarkable for a German woman of the time, and her letters demonstrate a liberating process of communication that allowed individuals hingered by gender, educational background or social status to debate contemporary issues and exchange serviced as they negotiated their entry into the public sphere.