Methyl-(3-hydroxy-2-isopentyl-phenyl)-aether

• 分子结构分类: 有机化合物 - 苯类化合物 - 酚类
• 英文名称: Methyl-(3-hydroxy-2-isopentyl-phenyl)-aether
• 英文别名: 6-Hydroxy-2-methoxy-1-isopentyl-benzol；2-Isopentyl-3-methoxy-phenol；3-Methoxy-2-(3-methylbutyl)phenol；3-methoxy-2-(3-methylbutyl)phenol
• 化学式: C₁₂H₁₈O₂
• 分子量: 194.274
• InChiKey: VOUMVAOVHRBIIW-UHFFFAOYSA-N

计算性质

• 辛醇/水分配系数(LogP)：
  3.7
• 重原子数：
  14
• 可旋转键数：
  4
• 环数：
  1.0
• sp3杂化的碳原子比例：
  0.5
• 拓扑面积：
  29.5
• 氢给体数：
  1
• 氢受体数：
  2

反应信息

• 作为反应物：
  描述：

  苹果酸 、 Methyl-(3-hydroxy-2-isopentyl-phenyl)-aether 在 硫酸 作用下， 生成 8-异戊基-7-甲氧基-2H-色烯-2-酮
  参考文献：
  名称：

  Injustice in forensic psychiatry: the Scott-Moncrieff hypothesis revisited

  摘要：

  Scott-Moncrieff (1993) argued that key decision-making in forensic psychiatry may be biased against the individual by false or misleading information presented in reports. We examined this by comparing accounts of incidents and other problems in reports to the mental health review tribunal, with contemporaneous records. In a regional secure unit a significant discrepancy was found, particularly in the reporting of aggressive behaviour. The authors argue that reliance on verbal accounts and inadequate contemporaneous notekeeping are more likely explanations than true bias, but accept Scott-Moncrieff's recommendation of proper investigation of incidents in hospital.

  DOI：

  10.1080/09585180050142660
• 作为产物：
  描述：

  2-hydroxy-3-isopentyl-4-methoxy-benzoic acid 生成 Methyl-(3-hydroxy-2-isopentyl-phenyl)-aether
  参考文献：
  名称：

  Injustice in forensic psychiatry: the Scott-Moncrieff hypothesis revisited

  摘要：

  Scott-Moncrieff (1993) argued that key decision-making in forensic psychiatry may be biased against the individual by false or misleading information presented in reports. We examined this by comparing accounts of incidents and other problems in reports to the mental health review tribunal, with contemporaneous records. In a regional secure unit a significant discrepancy was found, particularly in the reporting of aggressive behaviour. The authors argue that reliance on verbal accounts and inadequate contemporaneous notekeeping are more likely explanations than true bias, but accept Scott-Moncrieff's recommendation of proper investigation of incidents in hospital.

  DOI：

  10.1080/09585180050142660