1-(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-[1]naphthyl)-ethanone semicarbazone

• 分子结构分类: 有机化合物 - 苯类化合物 - 四氢化萘
• 英文名称: 1-(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-[1]naphthyl)-ethanone semicarbazone
• 英文别名: 1-(1,2,3,4-Tetrahydro-[1]naphthyl)-aethanon-semicarbazon；[(E)-1-(1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-yl)ethylideneamino]urea
• 化学式: C₁₃H₁₇N₃O
• 分子量: 231.297
• InChiKey: WXHRBMRTHZCPRT-OQLLNIDSSA-N

计算性质

• 辛醇/水分配系数(LogP)：
  1.7
• 重原子数：
  17
• 可旋转键数：
  2
• 环数：
  2.0
• sp3杂化的碳原子比例：
  0.38
• 拓扑面积：
  67.5
• 氢给体数：
  2
• 氢受体数：
  2

反应信息

• 作为产物：
  描述：

  alkaline earth salt of/the/ methylsulfuric acid 生成 1-(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-[1]naphthyl)-ethanone semicarbazone
  参考文献：
  名称：

  The slippery slope of constructivism

  摘要：

  While constructivism as both a philosophy and a clinical practice is being embraced by many individual and family practitioners, it remains controversial. This paper examines the difficulties one encounters in trying to balance the client's "relative truths" with those around them, including that of the therapist. Through the use of clinical vignettes, the authors demonstrate the difficulties inherent in dealing with ambiguities in the clinical situation, balancing the client's perspective, with that of a predominant culture or biological "fact," and considering the issue of the client's "veracity." Particular attention is paid to the difficulties involved in work with trauma survivors, whose own recollections of events may be ambiguous. Finally, the authors discuss the implications that constructivism holds for research and social action and advocacy. In sum, the authors recognize significant promise in the constructivist perspective, but caution clinicians to consider the inherent difficulties in a theory that relies on the relativity of truth.

  DOI：

  10.1080/00377310209517656

文献信息

• The slippery slope of constructivism
  作者：Terry Brumley Northcut、Nina Rovinelli Heller

  DOI：10.1080/00377310209517656

  日期：2002.3

  While constructivism as both a philosophy and a clinical practice is being embraced by many individual and family practitioners, it remains controversial. This paper examines the difficulties one encounters in trying to balance the client's "relative truths" with those around them, including that of the therapist. Through the use of clinical vignettes, the authors demonstrate the difficulties inherent in dealing with ambiguities in the clinical situation, balancing the client's perspective, with that of a predominant culture or biological "fact," and considering the issue of the client's "veracity." Particular attention is paid to the difficulties involved in work with trauma survivors, whose own recollections of events may be ambiguous. Finally, the authors discuss the implications that constructivism holds for research and social action and advocacy. In sum, the authors recognize significant promise in the constructivist perspective, but caution clinicians to consider the inherent difficulties in a theory that relies on the relativity of truth.