Coordination chemistry of NSO−, NSO2− and S3N− ligands: comparison of electronic structure of RhNSO, RhSH and RhCl complexes
摘要:
CsNSO2 reacts with fluoro complexes, trans-[M(CO)F(PPh3)2] (M = Rh, Ir) to give sulfonylnitrido complexes, trans-[M(CO)(NSO2)(PPh3)2] which react with triphenylphosphine to afford thionitro complexes, trans-[M(CO)(NSO)(PPh3)2]. The thionitro complexes are also prepared by the reaction of CsNSO2 with hydrido complexes, [MH(CO)(PPh3)3]. Reaction of CsNSO2 with [RuH2(CO)(PPh3)2] yields [Ru(CO)(NSO2)2(PPh3)2]. The sulfonylnitrido complexes of the type Cs2[M'(NS)(NSO2)2Cl3] (M' = Ru, Os) are prepared by the reaction of CsNSO2 and [M'(NS)Cl3]. The reactions of heptasulfurimide with [RhCl(PPh3)3] and [Rh(CO)Cl(PPh3)2] afford disulfidothinitrato complexes [Rh(S3N)(PPh3)2] and [Rh(CO)(S3N)(PPh3)2], respectively. CNDO/2 molecular orbital calculations have been performed on the model systems trans-[Rh(CO)L(PH3)2] (L = NSO, SH, Cl) in order to investigate the nature and energetics of the interaction between rhodium and NSO, SH, Cl ligands. The computed trends for Rh-X, Rh-C and C-O bond strengths, as measured by Wiberg indices and charge distributions, suggest that the strength of the coordination bond Rh-L increases in the order [Rh-NSO] < [Rh-Cl] < [Rh-SH] and the strength of the Rh-C bond increases in the order [Rh(CO)Cl(PH3)2] < [Rh(CO)(NSO)-(PH3)2] < [Rh(CO)(SH)(PH3)2]. The trend in C-O bond strength is [Rh(CO)Cl(PH3)2] > [Rh(CO)(NSO)-(PH3)2] > [Rh(CO)(SH)(PH3)2]. The NSO group is the worst pi-acceptor amongst the three ligands.
Coordination chemistry of NSO−, NSO2− and S3N− ligands: comparison of electronic structure of RhNSO, RhSH and RhCl complexes
摘要:
CsNSO2 reacts with fluoro complexes, trans-[M(CO)F(PPh3)2] (M = Rh, Ir) to give sulfonylnitrido complexes, trans-[M(CO)(NSO2)(PPh3)2] which react with triphenylphosphine to afford thionitro complexes, trans-[M(CO)(NSO)(PPh3)2]. The thionitro complexes are also prepared by the reaction of CsNSO2 with hydrido complexes, [MH(CO)(PPh3)3]. Reaction of CsNSO2 with [RuH2(CO)(PPh3)2] yields [Ru(CO)(NSO2)2(PPh3)2]. The sulfonylnitrido complexes of the type Cs2[M'(NS)(NSO2)2Cl3] (M' = Ru, Os) are prepared by the reaction of CsNSO2 and [M'(NS)Cl3]. The reactions of heptasulfurimide with [RhCl(PPh3)3] and [Rh(CO)Cl(PPh3)2] afford disulfidothinitrato complexes [Rh(S3N)(PPh3)2] and [Rh(CO)(S3N)(PPh3)2], respectively. CNDO/2 molecular orbital calculations have been performed on the model systems trans-[Rh(CO)L(PH3)2] (L = NSO, SH, Cl) in order to investigate the nature and energetics of the interaction between rhodium and NSO, SH, Cl ligands. The computed trends for Rh-X, Rh-C and C-O bond strengths, as measured by Wiberg indices and charge distributions, suggest that the strength of the coordination bond Rh-L increases in the order [Rh-NSO] < [Rh-Cl] < [Rh-SH] and the strength of the Rh-C bond increases in the order [Rh(CO)Cl(PH3)2] < [Rh(CO)(NSO)-(PH3)2] < [Rh(CO)(SH)(PH3)2]. The trend in C-O bond strength is [Rh(CO)Cl(PH3)2] > [Rh(CO)(NSO)-(PH3)2] > [Rh(CO)(SH)(PH3)2]. The NSO group is the worst pi-acceptor amongst the three ligands.